Throughout
the article the writer, Adrian Shaughnessy, claims that there is no such thing
as true originality. Thus, an idea that is purely original doesn't exist and it
must have come from some other idea, in other words, copied from somewhere or
something else.
However
our today’s society, especially in the commercial of art and design,
originality is very strongly emphasized. This is very much inconsistent considering
that commercial is all about communication. Yet if something was said that it
is absolutely original it would be impossible for us to recognize it or understand
it. He criticizes the way that the modern society is misunderstanding the real
intention of ‘copying’.
It
is very true that copyright laws must be necessary in order to protect creative
producers from their ideas to be stolen by others and prevent every good idea
to be endlessly repeated by everyone. Nevertheless, today the understanding of
copying has become something more severe. Copying and plagiarism is known to be
a crime and something to be felt guilty about it. Customers demands for more
and more originality creating an infinite cycle of producing and earning profit
and force too much competition. As a consequence of the fear about copyright
laws naturally everyone is turned to competitors and rivals and nothing is able
to be shared.
Although
not much will recognize it but we all do copy. This doesn't mean copying the
whole thing directly, but copying the idea and ‘montage’ it. And if this is
done with some creativity then something good is created out of it. So, this is
how everything is created, by copying. Yet people are trying to rationalize it
by saying that it is just a reference and inspiration, not knowing that both
are forms of copying.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기